Hi
But that is what is says on the Kit. Quote :- Switch on at dusk, turn off at dawn, fully automatic. Wide range adjustable sensitivity. Delay circuit avoids cycling …etc
It doesn’t say "Switch on and off and on and off and on at dusk, and off and on and off and on and off at dawn.
I had assumed that the “Delay circuit avoids cycling” was supposed to stop this “flicking” on / off. If not what does it mean? there are 3 threads I picked up on in the forum which seem to be discussing the same problem.
On the thread MK125 17th March 2009 [url]Mk125] it says:-
You can increase hysteresis by adding a resistor from the output to the non-inverting input (+) of the op-amp.
Sorry, no values, please experiment (e.g. 100K)
On the thread MK125 Light sensitive switch 8th March 2007 [url]Mk 125] it says:-
You could in increase the value of R4. Please experiment with different values.
On the thread MK125 Light Sensitive Switch (schemerschakelaar) Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:09 pm [url]MK125 Light Sensitive Switch (schemerschakelaar)] it says:-
Just remove C3 (100uF). For stabilty reasons you can mount a 100nF capacitor for C3, but remove the ELCO first.
This is for removing the delay so by inference increasing C3 should increase the delay.
In reading the posters comments I think they were having the same problem as me, and therefore these posts above were possible solutions. My thinking was that if the delay were increased then the light may have just got a bit lighter then started to get darker again before the circuit fired. If the delay were long enough all the light / dark fluctuations around the switch point would be over so it would only fire once.
Not understanding electronics in any great detail I thought that perhaps the capacitor C3 was discharging through R4 once the light sensor reached the switch point. Only when it had discharged to some predetermined level would the relay fire. Therefore if the capacitor value was increased it should take longer to discharge, similarly if R4 was increased it would also take longer. Thus it may have been possible to extend the delay enough to get past the tipping point.
Hopefully this is true and you misunderstood my first post, please advise.
If it really won’t work then I’ll have to think of something else. (Sorry for the length of Post)
Regards
Jeff